Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Mauritius
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
United Kingdom
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Mauritius rank
101st
United Kingdom rank
103rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Mauritius
  • United Kingdom
00000196119912022

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in United Kingdom, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 101st and United Kingdom ranks 103rd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and United Kingdom in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Mauritius
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Mauritius
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Mauritius
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person United Kingdom
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person United Kingdom
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person United Kingdom
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Mauritius or United Kingdom?
Mauritius, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in United Kingdom as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Mauritius and United Kingdom?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United Kingdom?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Mauritius and United Kingdom rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Mauritius ranks 101st and United Kingdom ranks 103rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/mauritius/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/mauritius/united-kingdom/">Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.