Mauritania vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Mauritania
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Singapore
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Mauritania rank
172nd
Singapore rank
169th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Mauritania
  • Singapore
00000196119912022

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Mauritania, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.3 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 172nd and Singapore ranks 169th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 4 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Mauritania
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Mauritania
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Mauritania
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Mauritania
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Singapore
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Singapore
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Mauritania or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Mauritania as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Mauritania and Singapore?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Singapore?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Mauritania and Singapore rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Mauritania ranks 172nd and Singapore ranks 169th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/mauritania/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/mauritania/singapore/">Mauritania vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.