Mauritania vs Saudi Arabia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Mauritania
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Saudi Arabia
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Mauritania rank
172nd
Saudi Arabia rank
175th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Mauritania
  • Saudi Arabia
000000196119912022

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Mauritania ranks 172nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 175th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Saudi Arabia
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Saudi Arabia
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Saudi Arabia
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Saudi Arabia
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Mauritania
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Mauritania
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Mauritania or Saudi Arabia?
Mauritania, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Saudi Arabia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Mauritania and Saudi Arabia?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Saudi Arabia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Mauritania and Saudi Arabia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Mauritania ranks 172nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 175th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Saudi Arabia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/mauritania/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/mauritania/saudi-arabia/">Mauritania vs Saudi Arabia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.