Madagascar vs Mongolia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Madagascar
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Mongolia
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Madagascar rank
42nd
Mongolia rank
44th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Madagascar
  • Mongolia
000196119912022

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Mongolia, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.

Madagascar ranks 42nd and Mongolia ranks 44th of 183 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Madagascar
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Madagascar
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Madagascar
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Madagascar
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Madagascar
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Madagascar
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Madagascar or Mongolia?
Madagascar, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Mongolia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Madagascar and Mongolia?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Mongolia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Madagascar and Mongolia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Madagascar ranks 42nd and Mongolia ranks 44th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Mongolia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/madagascar/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/madagascar/mongolia/">Madagascar vs Mongolia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.