Lower middle income vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Lower middle income
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Myanmar
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Lower middle income rank
37th
Myanmar rank
34th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Lower middle income
  • Myanmar
000000196119912022

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Lower middle income, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 7.5 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Lower middle income ranks 37th and Myanmar ranks 34th of 43 groups.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lower middle income Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Lower middle income or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Lower middle income as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Lower middle income and Myanmar?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Myanmar?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Lower middle income and Myanmar rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Lower middle income ranks 37th and Myanmar ranks 34th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/lower-middle-income/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/lower-middle-income/myanmar/">Lower middle income vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.