IDA & IBRD total vs Panama: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

IDA & IBRD total
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Panama
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
IDA & IBRD total rank
16th
Panama rank
19th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • IDA & IBRD total
  • Panama
000000196119912022

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Panama's figure about 6.2 times IDA & IBRD total's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 16th and Panama ranks 19th of 43 groups.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA & IBRD total Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Panama
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Panama
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Panama
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Panama
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Panama
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Panama
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), IDA & IBRD total or Panama?
Panama, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in IDA & IBRD total as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between IDA & IBRD total and Panama?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Panama?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do IDA & IBRD total and Panama rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
IDA & IBRD total ranks 16th and Panama ranks 19th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs Panama: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/ida-and-ibrd-total/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/ida-and-ibrd-total/panama/">IDA & IBRD total vs Panama: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.