Guinea vs Lower middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Guinea
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Lower middle income
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Guinea rank
38th
Lower middle income rank
37th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Guinea
  • Lower middle income
0000196119912022

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Lower middle income, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Guinea's figure about 6.5 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 38th and Lower middle income ranks 37th of 183 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Lower middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Guinea
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Guinea
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Guinea
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Guinea
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Guinea
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Guinea
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Guinea or Lower middle income?
Guinea, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Lower middle income as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Guinea and Lower middle income?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Lower middle income?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Guinea and Lower middle income rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Guinea ranks 38th and Lower middle income ranks 37th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Lower middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/guinea/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/guinea/lower-middle-income/">Guinea vs Lower middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.