Germany vs Republic of Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Germany
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Republic of Korea
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Germany rank
118th
Republic of Korea rank
120th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Germany
  • Republic of Korea
0000196119912022

How they compare

Germany currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Republic of Korea ahead.

Germany ranks 118th and Republic of Korea ranks 120th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Korea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Republic of Korea
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Republic of Korea
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Republic of Korea
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Republic of Korea
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Republic of Korea
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Germany
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Germany or Republic of Korea?
Germany, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Republic of Korea as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Germany and Republic of Korea?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Republic of Korea?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Germany and Republic of Korea rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Germany ranks 118th and Republic of Korea ranks 120th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Republic of Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/germany/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/germany/korea-rep/">Germany vs Republic of Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.