Euro area vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Euro area
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Iceland
0.0004 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Euro area rank
3rd
Iceland rank
1st

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Euro area
  • Iceland
0000.0010.0010.001196119912022

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0004 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Euro area, a difference of 0.0004 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Iceland's figure about 147.8 times Euro area's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 3rd and Iceland ranks 1st of 3 groups.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0009 billion cubic meters per person 0.0009 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0008 billion cubic meters per person 0.0008 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0007 billion cubic meters per person 0.0007 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0006 billion cubic meters per person 0.0006 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0006 billion cubic meters per person 0.0006 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0005 billion cubic meters per person 0.0005 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0005 billion cubic meters per person 0.0005 billion cubic meters per person Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Euro area or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.0004 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Euro area as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Euro area and Iceland?
0.0004 billion cubic meters per person, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Iceland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Euro area and Iceland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Euro area ranks 3rd and Iceland ranks 1st of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/euro-area/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/euro-area/iceland/">Euro area vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.