Dominican Republic vs Eswatini: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Dominican Republic
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Eswatini
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
105th
Eswatini rank
102nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Eswatini
0000196119912022

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 105th and Eswatini ranks 102nd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Eswatini
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Eswatini
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Eswatini
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Dominican Republic
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Dominican Republic
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Eswatini
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Dominican Republic or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Dominican Republic and Eswatini?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Eswatini?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Dominican Republic and Eswatini rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Dominican Republic ranks 105th and Eswatini ranks 102nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Eswatini: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/dominican-republic/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/dominican-republic/eswatini/">Dominican Republic vs Eswatini: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.