Costa Rica vs Finland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Costa Rica
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Finland
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
29th
Finland rank
31st

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Finland
0000196119912022

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Finland, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 29th and Finland ranks 31st of 183 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Costa Rica
1970s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Costa Rica
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Costa Rica
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Costa Rica
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Costa Rica
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Costa Rica
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Costa Rica or Finland?
Costa Rica, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Finland as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Costa Rica and Finland?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Finland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Costa Rica and Finland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Costa Rica ranks 29th and Finland ranks 31st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Finland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/costa-rica/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/costa-rica/finland/">Costa Rica vs Finland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.