Congo vs East Asia & Pacific: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)
Congo
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
East Asia & Pacific
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Congo rank
16th
East Asia & Pacific rank
19th
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time
- Congo
- East Asia & Pacific
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.
That makes Congo's figure about 8.7 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 61 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 16th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 19th of 183 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | East Asia & Pacific | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person | Congo |
| 1970s | 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person | Congo |
| 1980s | 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Congo or East Asia & Pacific?
- Congo, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in East Asia & Pacific as of 2022.
- What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Congo and East Asia & Pacific?
- 0 billion cubic meters per person, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and East Asia & Pacific?
- 61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
- How do Congo and East Asia & Pacific rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- Congo ranks 16th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 19th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.