How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Malawi?

62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Chad

0 billion cubic meters per person

in 2022

Malawi

0 billion cubic meters per person

in 2022

Chad rank

137th

Malawi rank

140th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

Chad
Malawi

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Malawi, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 137th and Malawi ranks 140th of 183 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	Chad
1970s	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	Chad
1980s	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	Chad
1990s	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	Chad
2000s	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	Chad
2010s	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	Chad
2020s	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	0 billion cubic meters per person	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Chad or Malawi?: Chad, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Chad and Malawi?: 0 billion cubic meters per person, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Malawi?: 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Chad and Malawi rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?: Chad ranks 137th and Malawi ranks 140th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/chad/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/chad/malawi/">Chad vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit: billion cubic meters per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.