Canada vs Euro area: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Canada
0.0001 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Euro area
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Canada rank
6th
Euro area rank
3rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Canada
  • Euro area
0000196119912022

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Euro area, a difference of 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Canada's figure about 24.3 times Euro area's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 6th and Euro area ranks 3rd of 183 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Euro area Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Canada
1970s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Canada
1980s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Canada
1990s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Canada
2000s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Canada
2010s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Canada
2020s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Canada or Euro area?
Canada, at 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Euro area as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Canada and Euro area?
0.0001 billion cubic meters per person, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Euro area?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Canada and Euro area rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Canada ranks 6th and Euro area ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Euro area: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/canada/euro-area/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/canada/euro-area/">Canada vs Euro area: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.