Burkina Faso vs Cape Verde: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Burkina Faso
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Cape Verde
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Burkina Faso rank
154th
Cape Verde rank
152nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Cape Verde
00000196119912022

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 154th and Cape Verde ranks 152nd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 6 and Cape Verde in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Burkina Faso
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Burkina Faso
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Burkina Faso
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Burkina Faso
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Burkina Faso
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Burkina Faso
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Burkina Faso or Cape Verde?
Cape Verde, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Burkina Faso as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Burkina Faso and Cape Verde?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Cape Verde?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Burkina Faso and Cape Verde rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Burkina Faso ranks 154th and Cape Verde ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Cape Verde: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/burkina-faso/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/burkina-faso/cabo-verde/">Burkina Faso vs Cape Verde: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.