Bhutan vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Bhutan
0.0001 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Suriname
0.0002 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Bhutan rank
4th
Suriname rank
3rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Suriname
0000196119912022

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person against 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.6 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 3rd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 billion cubic meters per person 0.0003 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Bhutan
1970s 0.0003 billion cubic meters per person 0.0003 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Bhutan
1980s 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person 0.0003 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Suriname
1990s 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Suriname
2000s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Suriname
2010s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Suriname
2020s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Bhutan or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person against 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person in Bhutan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Bhutan and Suriname?
0.0001 billion cubic meters per person, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Suriname?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bhutan and Suriname rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Bhutan ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/bhutan/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/bhutan/suriname/">Bhutan vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.