Bhutan vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Bhutan
0.0001 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Iceland
0.0004 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Bhutan rank
4th
Iceland rank
1st

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Iceland
0000.0010.0010.001196119912022

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0004 billion cubic meters per person against 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0003 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Iceland's figure about 4.5 times Bhutan's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 4th and Iceland ranks 1st of 183 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 billion cubic meters per person 0.0009 billion cubic meters per person 0.0005 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
1970s 0.0003 billion cubic meters per person 0.0008 billion cubic meters per person 0.0005 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
1980s 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person 0.0007 billion cubic meters per person 0.0005 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
1990s 0.0002 billion cubic meters per person 0.0006 billion cubic meters per person 0.0005 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
2000s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0006 billion cubic meters per person 0.0004 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
2010s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0005 billion cubic meters per person 0.0004 billion cubic meters per person Iceland
2020s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0005 billion cubic meters per person 0.0004 billion cubic meters per person Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Bhutan or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.0004 billion cubic meters per person against 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person in Bhutan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Bhutan and Iceland?
0.0003 billion cubic meters per person, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Iceland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bhutan and Iceland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Bhutan ranks 4th and Iceland ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/bhutan/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/bhutan/iceland/">Bhutan vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.