Belize vs Upper middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Belize
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Upper middle income
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Belize rank
14th
Upper middle income rank
14th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Belize
  • Upper middle income
0000196119912022

How they compare

Belize currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Upper middle income, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Belize's figure about 6.2 times Upper middle income's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Belize has been ahead every year.

Belize ranks 14th and Upper middle income ranks 14th of 183 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Upper middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Belize
1970s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Belize
1980s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Belize
1990s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Belize
2000s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Belize
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Belize
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Belize or Upper middle income?
Belize, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Upper middle income as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Belize and Upper middle income?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Upper middle income?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Belize and Upper middle income rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Belize ranks 14th and Upper middle income ranks 14th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Upper middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/belize/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/belize/upper-middle-income/">Belize vs Upper middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.