Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Bangladesh
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Cape Verde
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Bangladesh rank
150th
Cape Verde rank
152nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Cape Verde
0000196119912022

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Cape Verde, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 150th and Cape Verde ranks 152nd of 183 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Bangladesh
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Bangladesh
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Bangladesh
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Bangladesh
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Bangladesh
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Bangladesh
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Bangladesh or Cape Verde?
Bangladesh, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Cape Verde as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Bangladesh and Cape Verde?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cape Verde?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bangladesh and Cape Verde rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Bangladesh ranks 150th and Cape Verde ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/bangladesh/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/bangladesh/cabo-verde/">Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.