Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)
Australia
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Sub-Saharan Africa
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Australia rank
32nd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
31st
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time
- Australia
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.
That makes Australia's figure about 6.0 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 62 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 31st of 183 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | Australia |
| 1970s | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | Australia |
| 1980s | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | Australia |
| 1990s | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | Australia |
| 2000s | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | Australia |
| 2010s | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | 0 billion cubic meters per person | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Australia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Australia, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 0 billion cubic meters per person, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- Australia ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 31st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.