Australia vs IDA blend: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Australia
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
IDA blend
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Australia rank
32nd
IDA blend rank
33rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Australia
  • IDA blend
000000196119912022

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in IDA blend, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Australia's figure about 6.7 times IDA blend's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 32nd and IDA blend ranks 33rd of 183 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia IDA blend Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Australia
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Australia
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Australia
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Australia
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Australia
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Australia
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Australia or IDA blend?
Australia, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in IDA blend as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Australia and IDA blend?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and IDA blend?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Australia and IDA blend rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Australia ranks 32nd and IDA blend ranks 33rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs IDA blend: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/australia/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/australia/ida-blend/">Australia vs IDA blend: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.