Angola vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Angola
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Switzerland
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Angola rank
69th
Switzerland rank
67th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Angola
  • Switzerland
000000196119912022

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Angola, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 69th and Switzerland ranks 67th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 6 and Switzerland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Angola
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Angola
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Angola
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Angola
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Angola
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Angola
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Angola or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Angola as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Angola and Switzerland?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Switzerland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Angola and Switzerland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Angola ranks 69th and Switzerland ranks 67th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/angola/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/angola/switzerland/">Angola vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.