Afghanistan vs South Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Afghanistan
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
South Korea
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Afghanistan rank
122nd
South Korea rank
120th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • South Korea
00000196119912022

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Afghanistan, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 122nd and South Korea ranks 120th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 6 and South Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan South Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Afghanistan
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Afghanistan
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Afghanistan
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Afghanistan
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Afghanistan
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Afghanistan
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Afghanistan or South Korea?
South Korea, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Afghanistan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Afghanistan and South Korea?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and South Korea?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Afghanistan and South Korea rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Afghanistan ranks 122nd and South Korea ranks 120th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs South Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/afghanistan/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/afghanistan/korea-rep/">Afghanistan vs South Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.