Tanzania vs Ukraine: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Tanzania
1,298 cubic meters
in 2022
Ukraine
1,342 cubic meters
in 2022
Tanzania rank
117th
Ukraine rank
116th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Tanzania
  • Ukraine
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119912022

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 1,342 cubic meters against 1,298 cubic meters in Tanzania, a difference of 44 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tanzania ahead.

Tanzania ranks 117th and Ukraine ranks 116th of 183 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 2,766 cubic meters 1,073 cubic meters 1,693 cubic meters Tanzania
2000s 2,179 cubic meters 1,151 cubic meters 1,028 cubic meters Tanzania
2010s 1,643 cubic meters 1,203 cubic meters 440.04 cubic meters Tanzania
2020s 1,338 cubic meters 1,273 cubic meters 64.43 cubic meters Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Tanzania or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 1,342 cubic meters against 1,298 cubic meters in Tanzania as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Tanzania and Ukraine?
44 cubic meters, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Ukraine?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Tanzania and Ukraine rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Tanzania ranks 117th and Ukraine ranks 116th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs Ukraine: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/tanzania/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/tanzania/ukraine/">Tanzania vs Ukraine: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.