How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Sri Lanka?

30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Slovakia vs Sri Lanka: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Slovakia

2,320 cubic meters

in 2022

Sri Lanka

2,380 cubic meters

in 2022

Slovakia rank

96th

Sri Lanka rank

93rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

Slovakia
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 2,380 cubic meters against 2,320 cubic meters in Slovakia, a difference of 60 cubic meters.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Slovakia ranks 96th and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 183 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Slovakia	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2,347 cubic meters	2,947 cubic meters	600.23 cubic meters	Sri Lanka
2000s	2,343 cubic meters	2,626 cubic meters	282.67 cubic meters	Sri Lanka
2010s	2,324 cubic meters	2,497 cubic meters	173.2 cubic meters	Sri Lanka
2020s	2,314 cubic meters	2,391 cubic meters	77.14 cubic meters	Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Slovakia or Sri Lanka?: Sri Lanka, at 2,380 cubic meters against 2,320 cubic meters in Slovakia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Slovakia and Sri Lanka?: 60 cubic meters, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Sri Lanka?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.
How do Slovakia and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?: Slovakia ranks 96th and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovakia vs Sri Lanka: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/slovak-republic/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/slovak-republic/sri-lanka/">Slovakia vs Sri Lanka: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit: cubic meters
Source: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.