Singapore vs Palestine, State of: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Singapore
106.44 cubic meters
in 2022
Palestine, State of
164.95 cubic meters
in 2021
Singapore rank
169th
Palestine, State of rank
167th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Singapore
  • Palestine, State of
100200300400196119912022

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 164.95 cubic meters against 106.44 cubic meters in Singapore, a difference of 58.51 cubic meters.

That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.5 times Singapore's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.

Singapore ranks 169th and Palestine, State of ranks 167th of 183 countries.

Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 172.67 cubic meters 339.97 cubic meters 167.3 cubic meters Palestine, State of
2000s 137.95 cubic meters 248.25 cubic meters 110.3 cubic meters Palestine, State of
2010s 110.16 cubic meters 193.07 cubic meters 82.91 cubic meters Palestine, State of
2020s 107.77 cubic meters 167 cubic meters 59.23 cubic meters Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Singapore or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 164.95 cubic meters against 106.44 cubic meters in Singapore as of 2021.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Singapore and Palestine, State of?
58.51 cubic meters, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Palestine, State of?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Singapore and Palestine, State of rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Singapore ranks 169th and Palestine, State of ranks 167th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Palestine, State of: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/singapore/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/singapore/west-bank-and-gaza/">Singapore vs Palestine, State of: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.