Singapore vs Turkmenistan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Singapore
106.44 cubic meters
in 2022
Turkmenistan
194.32 cubic meters
in 2022
Singapore rank
169th
Turkmenistan rank
166th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Singapore
  • Turkmenistan
100200300400196119912022

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 194.32 cubic meters against 106.44 cubic meters in Singapore, a difference of 87.88 cubic meters.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.8 times Singapore's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.

Singapore ranks 169th and Turkmenistan ranks 166th of 183 countries.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 167.3 cubic meters 333.24 cubic meters 165.94 cubic meters Turkmenistan
2000s 137.95 cubic meters 281.35 cubic meters 143.4 cubic meters Turkmenistan
2010s 110.16 cubic meters 228.99 cubic meters 118.83 cubic meters Turkmenistan
2020s 107.33 cubic meters 198.2 cubic meters 90.87 cubic meters Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Singapore or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 194.32 cubic meters against 106.44 cubic meters in Singapore as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Singapore and Turkmenistan?
87.88 cubic meters, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Turkmenistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Singapore and Turkmenistan rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Singapore ranks 169th and Turkmenistan ranks 166th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Turkmenistan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/singapore/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/singapore/turkmenistan/">Singapore vs Turkmenistan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.