Rwanda vs South Africa: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Rwanda
695.92 cubic meters
in 2022
South Africa
718.2 cubic meters
in 2022
Rwanda rank
146th
South Africa rank
145th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Rwanda
  • South Africa
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k196119912022

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 718.2 cubic meters against 695.92 cubic meters in Rwanda, a difference of 22.28 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 146th and South Africa ranks 145th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 6 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 2,766 cubic meters 2,353 cubic meters 412.95 cubic meters Rwanda
1970s 2,099 cubic meters 1,776 cubic meters 322.55 cubic meters Rwanda
1980s 1,537 cubic meters 1,310 cubic meters 226.87 cubic meters Rwanda
1990s 1,303 cubic meters 1,019 cubic meters 284.23 cubic meters Rwanda
2000s 1,060 cubic meters 909.33 cubic meters 150.32 cubic meters Rwanda
2010s 828.48 cubic meters 802.5 cubic meters 25.97 cubic meters Rwanda
2020s 711.45 cubic meters 728.78 cubic meters 17.34 cubic meters South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Rwanda or South Africa?
South Africa, at 718.2 cubic meters against 695.92 cubic meters in Rwanda as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Rwanda and South Africa?
22.28 cubic meters, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South Africa?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Rwanda and South Africa rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Rwanda ranks 146th and South Africa ranks 145th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs South Africa: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/rwanda/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/rwanda/south-africa/">Rwanda vs South Africa: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.