Puerto Rico vs Romania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Puerto Rico
2,205 cubic meters
in 2022
Romania
2,225 cubic meters
in 2022
Puerto Rico rank
100th
Romania rank
99th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Romania
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119912022

How they compare

Romania currently reports 2,225 cubic meters against 2,205 cubic meters in Puerto Rico, a difference of 20 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 100th and Romania ranks 99th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 4 and Romania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 2,768 cubic meters 2,212 cubic meters 555.63 cubic meters Puerto Rico
1970s 2,410 cubic meters 2,002 cubic meters 407.87 cubic meters Puerto Rico
1980s 2,115 cubic meters 1,867 cubic meters 248 cubic meters Puerto Rico
1990s 1,936 cubic meters 1,864 cubic meters 71.46 cubic meters Puerto Rico
2000s 1,868 cubic meters 1,985 cubic meters 117.76 cubic meters Romania
2010s 2,014 cubic meters 2,138 cubic meters 123.52 cubic meters Romania
2020s 2,182 cubic meters 2,214 cubic meters 32.14 cubic meters Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Puerto Rico or Romania?
Romania, at 2,225 cubic meters against 2,205 cubic meters in Puerto Rico as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Puerto Rico and Romania?
20 cubic meters, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Romania?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Puerto Rico and Romania rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Puerto Rico ranks 100th and Romania ranks 99th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Romania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/puerto-rico-us/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/puerto-rico-us/romania/">Puerto Rico vs Romania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.