Philippines vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Philippines
4,203 cubic meters
in 2022
Switzerland
4,603 cubic meters
in 2022
Philippines rank
68th
Switzerland rank
67th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Philippines
  • Switzerland
5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k15.0k17.5k196119912022

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 4,603 cubic meters against 4,203 cubic meters in Philippines, a difference of 400 cubic meters.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 68th and Switzerland ranks 67th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 5 and Switzerland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 14,753 cubic meters 6,941 cubic meters 7,812 cubic meters Philippines
1970s 11,484 cubic meters 6,433 cubic meters 5,051 cubic meters Philippines
1980s 8,843 cubic meters 6,247 cubic meters 2,596 cubic meters Philippines
1990s 6,875 cubic meters 5,792 cubic meters 1,083 cubic meters Philippines
2000s 5,516 cubic meters 5,441 cubic meters 74.96 cubic meters Philippines
2010s 4,610 cubic meters 4,919 cubic meters 308.47 cubic meters Switzerland
2020s 4,237 cubic meters 4,640 cubic meters 403.05 cubic meters Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Philippines or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 4,603 cubic meters against 4,203 cubic meters in Philippines as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Philippines and Switzerland?
400 cubic meters, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Switzerland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Philippines and Switzerland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Philippines ranks 68th and Switzerland ranks 67th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/philippines/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/philippines/switzerland/">Philippines vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.