OECD members vs Peru: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

OECD members
9,318 cubic meters
in 2022
Peru
49,021 cubic meters
in 2022
OECD members rank
11th
Peru rank
11th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • OECD members
  • Peru
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119912022

How they compare

Peru currently reports 49,021 cubic meters against 9,318 cubic meters in OECD members, a difference of 39,703 cubic meters.

That makes Peru's figure about 5.3 times OECD members's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 11th and Peru ranks 11th of 45 groups.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 15,040 cubic meters 139,997 cubic meters 124,956 cubic meters Peru
1970s 13,455 cubic meters 108,742 cubic meters 95,286 cubic meters Peru
1980s 12,263 cubic meters 84,893 cubic meters 72,630 cubic meters Peru
1990s 11,128 cubic meters 68,273 cubic meters 57,145 cubic meters Peru
2000s 10,271 cubic meters 58,888 cubic meters 48,618 cubic meters Peru
2010s 9,609 cubic meters 53,892 cubic meters 44,283 cubic meters Peru
2020s 9,311 cubic meters 49,495 cubic meters 40,184 cubic meters Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, OECD members or Peru?
Peru, at 49,021 cubic meters against 9,318 cubic meters in OECD members as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between OECD members and Peru?
39,703 cubic meters, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Peru?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Peru rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
OECD members ranks 11th and Peru ranks 11th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Peru: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/oecd-members/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/oecd-members/peru/">OECD members vs Peru: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.