North Macedonia vs Turkey: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)

North Macedonia
2,948 cubic meters
in 2022
Turkey
2,671 cubic meters
in 2022
North Macedonia rank
85th
Turkey rank
88th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters) over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Turkey
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119912022

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 2,948 cubic meters against 2,671 cubic meters in Turkey, a difference of 277 cubic meters.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Turkey's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkey ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 85th and Turkey ranks 88th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Turkey Difference Ahead
1990s 2,689 cubic meters 3,702 cubic meters 1,013 cubic meters Turkey
2000s 2,696 cubic meters 3,303 cubic meters 607.49 cubic meters Turkey
2010s 2,822 cubic meters 2,923 cubic meters 101.12 cubic meters Turkey
2020s 2,932 cubic meters 2,697 cubic meters 235.18 cubic meters North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, North Macedonia or Turkey?
North Macedonia, at 2,948 cubic meters against 2,671 cubic meters in Turkey as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between North Macedonia and Turkey?
277 cubic meters, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Turkey?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do North Macedonia and Turkey rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
North Macedonia ranks 85th and Turkey ranks 88th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Turkey: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/north-macedonia/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/north-macedonia/turkiye/">North Macedonia vs Turkey: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.