North America vs Solomon Islands: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

North America
15,198 cubic meters
in 2022
Solomon Islands
57,230 cubic meters
in 2022
North America rank
8th
Solomon Islands rank
10th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • North America
  • Solomon Islands
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119912022

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 57,230 cubic meters against 15,198 cubic meters in North America, a difference of 42,032 cubic meters.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 3.8 times North America's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.

North America ranks 8th and Solomon Islands ranks 10th of 45 groups.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North America Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 26,393 cubic meters 282,185 cubic meters 255,792 cubic meters Solomon Islands
1970s 23,841 cubic meters 224,955 cubic meters 201,114 cubic meters Solomon Islands
1980s 21,587 cubic meters 161,954 cubic meters 140,367 cubic meters Solomon Islands
1990s 19,325 cubic meters 118,466 cubic meters 99,141 cubic meters Solomon Islands
2000s 17,373 cubic meters 93,571 cubic meters 76,198 cubic meters Solomon Islands
2010s 15,931 cubic meters 71,724 cubic meters 55,793 cubic meters Solomon Islands
2020s 15,279 cubic meters 58,629 cubic meters 43,349 cubic meters Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, North America or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 57,230 cubic meters against 15,198 cubic meters in North America as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between North America and Solomon Islands?
42,032 cubic meters, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North America and Solomon Islands?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do North America and Solomon Islands rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
North America ranks 8th and Solomon Islands ranks 10th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North America vs Solomon Islands: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/north-america/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/north-america/solomon-islands/">North America vs Solomon Islands: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.