North America vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

North America
15,198 cubic meters
in 2022
Papua New Guinea
78,505 cubic meters
in 2022
North America rank
8th
Papua New Guinea rank
5th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • North America
  • Papua New Guinea
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119912022

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 78,505 cubic meters against 15,198 cubic meters in North America, a difference of 63,307 cubic meters.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 5.2 times North America's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

North America ranks 8th and Papua New Guinea ranks 5th of 47 groups.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North America Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 26,578 cubic meters 358,649 cubic meters 332,070 cubic meters Papua New Guinea
1970s 23,841 cubic meters 288,840 cubic meters 264,999 cubic meters Papua New Guinea
1980s 21,587 cubic meters 233,010 cubic meters 211,423 cubic meters Papua New Guinea
1990s 19,325 cubic meters 176,539 cubic meters 157,214 cubic meters Papua New Guinea
2000s 17,373 cubic meters 125,303 cubic meters 107,930 cubic meters Papua New Guinea
2010s 15,931 cubic meters 93,330 cubic meters 77,399 cubic meters Papua New Guinea
2020s 15,279 cubic meters 80,035 cubic meters 64,756 cubic meters Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, North America or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 78,505 cubic meters against 15,198 cubic meters in North America as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between North America and Papua New Guinea?
63,307 cubic meters, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North America and Papua New Guinea?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do North America and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
North America ranks 8th and Papua New Guinea ranks 5th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North America vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/north-america/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/north-america/papua-new-guinea/">North America vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.