Nicaragua vs Pre-demographic dividend: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Nicaragua
23,209 cubic meters
in 2022
Pre-demographic dividend
3,399 cubic meters
in 2022
Nicaragua rank
28th
Pre-demographic dividend rank
30th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Pre-demographic dividend
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119912022

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 23,209 cubic meters against 3,399 cubic meters in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 19,810 cubic meters.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 6.8 times Pre-demographic dividend's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.

Nicaragua ranks 28th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 30th of 183 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Pre-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1960s 75,538 cubic meters 17,872 cubic meters 57,665 cubic meters Nicaragua
1970s 56,532 cubic meters 13,857 cubic meters 42,674 cubic meters Nicaragua
1980s 42,885 cubic meters 10,494 cubic meters 32,391 cubic meters Nicaragua
1990s 34,213 cubic meters 7,890 cubic meters 26,323 cubic meters Nicaragua
2000s 29,385 cubic meters 5,898 cubic meters 23,487 cubic meters Nicaragua
2010s 25,609 cubic meters 4,234 cubic meters 21,375 cubic meters Nicaragua
2020s 23,504 cubic meters 3,488 cubic meters 20,016 cubic meters Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Nicaragua or Pre-demographic dividend?
Nicaragua, at 23,209 cubic meters against 3,399 cubic meters in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Nicaragua and Pre-demographic dividend?
19,810 cubic meters, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Pre-demographic dividend?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Nicaragua and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Nicaragua ranks 28th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 30th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Pre-demographic dividend: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/nicaragua/pre-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/nicaragua/pre-demographic-dividend/">Nicaragua vs Pre-demographic dividend: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.