Morocco vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Morocco
776.88 cubic meters
in 2022
Zimbabwe
762.96 cubic meters
in 2022
Morocco rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
143rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Morocco
  • Zimbabwe
1.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k196119912022

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 776.88 cubic meters against 762.96 cubic meters in Zimbabwe, a difference of 13.92 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Morocco ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2,193 cubic meters 2,759 cubic meters 565.62 cubic meters Zimbabwe
1970s 1,717 cubic meters 2,064 cubic meters 347.59 cubic meters Zimbabwe
1980s 1,337 cubic meters 1,454 cubic meters 117 cubic meters Zimbabwe
1990s 1,109 cubic meters 1,118 cubic meters 9.43 cubic meters Zimbabwe
2000s 961.93 cubic meters 985.17 cubic meters 23.24 cubic meters Zimbabwe
2010s 844.4 cubic meters 858.18 cubic meters 13.78 cubic meters Zimbabwe
2020s 784.77 cubic meters 776.21 cubic meters 8.56 cubic meters Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Morocco or Zimbabwe?
Morocco, at 776.88 cubic meters against 762.96 cubic meters in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Morocco and Zimbabwe?
13.92 cubic meters, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Morocco and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Morocco ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/morocco/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/morocco/zimbabwe/">Morocco vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.