Mexico vs Thailand: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Mexico
3,180 cubic meters
in 2022
Thailand
3,130 cubic meters
in 2022
Mexico rank
80th
Thailand rank
81st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Mexico
  • Thailand
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119912022

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 3,180 cubic meters against 3,130 cubic meters in Thailand, a difference of 50 cubic meters.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 80th and Thailand ranks 81st of 183 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 9,505 cubic meters 7,234 cubic meters 2,272 cubic meters Mexico
1970s 7,077 cubic meters 5,585 cubic meters 1,492 cubic meters Mexico
1980s 5,526 cubic meters 4,522 cubic meters 1,004 cubic meters Mexico
1990s 4,555 cubic meters 3,837 cubic meters 718.17 cubic meters Mexico
2000s 3,895 cubic meters 3,421 cubic meters 473.62 cubic meters Mexico
2010s 3,409 cubic meters 3,196 cubic meters 213.1 cubic meters Mexico
2020s 3,203 cubic meters 3,131 cubic meters 72.08 cubic meters Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Mexico or Thailand?
Mexico, at 3,180 cubic meters against 3,130 cubic meters in Thailand as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Mexico and Thailand?
50 cubic meters, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Thailand?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Mexico and Thailand rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Mexico ranks 80th and Thailand ranks 81st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Thailand: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/mexico/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/mexico/thailand/">Mexico vs Thailand: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.