Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Mauritius
2,179 cubic meters
in 2022
United Kingdom
2,144 cubic meters
in 2022
Mauritius rank
101st
United Kingdom rank
103rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Mauritius
  • United Kingdom
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 2,179 cubic meters against 2,144 cubic meters in United Kingdom, a difference of 35 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 101st and United Kingdom ranks 103rd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and United Kingdom in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1960s 3,678 cubic meters 2,673 cubic meters 1,005 cubic meters Mauritius
1970s 3,110 cubic meters 2,584 cubic meters 525.87 cubic meters Mauritius
1980s 2,717 cubic meters 2,563 cubic meters 153.92 cubic meters Mauritius
1990s 2,467 cubic meters 2,502 cubic meters 35.43 cubic meters United Kingdom
2000s 2,253 cubic meters 2,403 cubic meters 150.13 cubic meters United Kingdom
2010s 2,183 cubic meters 2,238 cubic meters 55.23 cubic meters United Kingdom
2020s 2,175 cubic meters 2,160 cubic meters 14.34 cubic meters Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Mauritius or United Kingdom?
Mauritius, at 2,179 cubic meters against 2,144 cubic meters in United Kingdom as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Mauritius and United Kingdom?
35 cubic meters, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United Kingdom?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Mauritius and United Kingdom rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Mauritius ranks 101st and United Kingdom ranks 103rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/mauritius/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/mauritius/united-kingdom/">Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.