Mauritius vs Romania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Mauritius
2,179 cubic meters
in 2022
Romania
2,225 cubic meters
in 2022
Mauritius rank
101st
Romania rank
99th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Mauritius
  • Romania
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

Romania currently reports 2,225 cubic meters against 2,179 cubic meters in Mauritius, a difference of 46 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 101st and Romania ranks 99th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 3,678 cubic meters 2,212 cubic meters 1,466 cubic meters Mauritius
1970s 3,110 cubic meters 2,002 cubic meters 1,108 cubic meters Mauritius
1980s 2,717 cubic meters 1,867 cubic meters 849.45 cubic meters Mauritius
1990s 2,467 cubic meters 1,864 cubic meters 602.4 cubic meters Mauritius
2000s 2,253 cubic meters 1,985 cubic meters 267.18 cubic meters Mauritius
2010s 2,183 cubic meters 2,138 cubic meters 45.43 cubic meters Mauritius
2020s 2,175 cubic meters 2,214 cubic meters 38.87 cubic meters Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Mauritius or Romania?
Romania, at 2,225 cubic meters against 2,179 cubic meters in Mauritius as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Mauritius and Romania?
46 cubic meters, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Romania?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Mauritius and Romania rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Mauritius ranks 101st and Romania ranks 99th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Romania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/mauritius/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/mauritius/romania/">Mauritius vs Romania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.