How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sudan?

11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Malta

95.08 cubic meters

in 2022

Sudan

81 cubic meters

in 2022

Malta rank

171st

Sudan rank

173rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

Malta
Sudan

How they compare

Malta currently reports 95.08 cubic meters against 81 cubic meters in Sudan, a difference of 14.08 cubic meters.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 173rd of 183 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	111.64 cubic meters	98.25 cubic meters	13.38 cubic meters	Malta
2020s	96.84 cubic meters	83.24 cubic meters	13.6 cubic meters	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Malta or Sudan?: Malta, at 95.08 cubic meters against 81 cubic meters in Sudan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Malta and Sudan?: 14.08 cubic meters, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sudan?: 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
How do Malta and Sudan rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?: Malta ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 173rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/malta/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/malta/sudan/">Malta vs Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit: cubic meters
Source: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.