Malta vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Malta
95.08 cubic meters
in 2022
Singapore
106.44 cubic meters
in 2022
Malta rank
171st
Singapore rank
169th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Malta
  • Singapore
100200300400196119912022

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 106.44 cubic meters against 95.08 cubic meters in Malta, a difference of 11.36 cubic meters.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Malta ranks 171st and Singapore ranks 169th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 159.51 cubic meters 319.87 cubic meters 160.36 cubic meters Singapore
1970s 165.46 cubic meters 268.61 cubic meters 103.15 cubic meters Singapore
1980s 151.2 cubic meters 222.61 cubic meters 71.41 cubic meters Singapore
1990s 134.95 cubic meters 172.67 cubic meters 37.71 cubic meters Singapore
2000s 125.76 cubic meters 137.95 cubic meters 12.18 cubic meters Singapore
2010s 113.62 cubic meters 110.16 cubic meters 3.46 cubic meters Malta
2020s 96.84 cubic meters 107.33 cubic meters 10.49 cubic meters Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Malta or Singapore?
Singapore, at 106.44 cubic meters against 95.08 cubic meters in Malta as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Malta and Singapore?
11.36 cubic meters, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Singapore?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Malta and Singapore rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Malta ranks 171st and Singapore ranks 169th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/malta/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/malta/singapore/">Malta vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.