Malta vs Mauritania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Malta
95.08 cubic meters
in 2022
Mauritania
82.04 cubic meters
in 2022
Malta rank
171st
Mauritania rank
172nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Malta
  • Mauritania
100200300400500196119912022

How they compare

Malta currently reports 95.08 cubic meters against 82.04 cubic meters in Mauritania, a difference of 13.04 cubic meters.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Malta ranks 171st and Mauritania ranks 172nd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 159.51 cubic meters 423.27 cubic meters 263.76 cubic meters Mauritania
1970s 165.46 cubic meters 319.28 cubic meters 153.82 cubic meters Mauritania
1980s 151.2 cubic meters 239.3 cubic meters 88.1 cubic meters Mauritania
1990s 134.95 cubic meters 178.48 cubic meters 43.53 cubic meters Mauritania
2000s 125.76 cubic meters 137.62 cubic meters 11.86 cubic meters Mauritania
2010s 113.62 cubic meters 102.92 cubic meters 10.7 cubic meters Malta
2020s 96.84 cubic meters 84.49 cubic meters 12.35 cubic meters Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Malta or Mauritania?
Malta, at 95.08 cubic meters against 82.04 cubic meters in Mauritania as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Malta and Mauritania?
13.04 cubic meters, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mauritania?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Malta and Mauritania rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Malta ranks 171st and Mauritania ranks 172nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Mauritania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/malta/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/malta/mauritania/">Malta vs Mauritania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.