Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Malawi
784.69 cubic meters
in 2022
Zimbabwe
762.96 cubic meters
in 2022
Malawi rank
140th
Zimbabwe rank
142nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Malawi
  • Zimbabwe
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 784.69 cubic meters against 762.96 cubic meters in Zimbabwe, a difference of 21.73 cubic meters.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 183 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 3,947 cubic meters 2,759 cubic meters 1,188 cubic meters Malawi
1970s 3,090 cubic meters 2,064 cubic meters 1,026 cubic meters Malawi
1980s 2,163 cubic meters 1,454 cubic meters 708.96 cubic meters Malawi
1990s 1,571 cubic meters 1,118 cubic meters 453.21 cubic meters Malawi
2000s 1,274 cubic meters 985.17 cubic meters 288.61 cubic meters Malawi
2010s 962.1 cubic meters 858.18 cubic meters 103.92 cubic meters Malawi
2020s 805.35 cubic meters 776.21 cubic meters 29.13 cubic meters Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
Malawi, at 784.69 cubic meters against 762.96 cubic meters in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
21.73 cubic meters, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Malawi ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/malawi/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/malawi/zimbabwe/">Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.