Low & middle income vs Russia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)

Low & middle income
4,242 cubic meters
in 2022
Russia
29,895 cubic meters
in 2022
Low & middle income rank
22nd
Russia rank
20th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters) over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Russia
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119912022

How they compare

Russia currently reports 29,895 cubic meters against 4,242 cubic meters in Low & middle income, a difference of 25,653 cubic meters.

That makes Russia's figure about 7.0 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 22nd and Russia ranks 20th of 47 groups.

Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Russia Difference Ahead
1990s 6,198 cubic meters 29,117 cubic meters 22,920 cubic meters Russia
2000s 5,370 cubic meters 29,916 cubic meters 24,546 cubic meters Russia
2010s 4,644 cubic meters 29,882 cubic meters 25,237 cubic meters Russia
2020s 4,282 cubic meters 29,791 cubic meters 25,509 cubic meters Russia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Low & middle income or Russia?
Russia, at 29,895 cubic meters against 4,242 cubic meters in Low & middle income as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Low & middle income and Russia?
25,653 cubic meters, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Russia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Low & middle income and Russia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Low & middle income ranks 22nd and Russia ranks 20th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Russia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/low-and-middle-income/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/low-and-middle-income/russian-federation/">Low & middle income vs Russia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.