Libya vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Libya
96.9 cubic meters
in 2022
Singapore
106.44 cubic meters
in 2022
Libya rank
170th
Singapore rank
169th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Libya
  • Singapore
100200300400196119912022

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 106.44 cubic meters against 96.9 cubic meters in Libya, a difference of 9.54 cubic meters.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 170th and Singapore ranks 169th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 392.9 cubic meters 319.87 cubic meters 73.03 cubic meters Libya
1970s 278.41 cubic meters 268.61 cubic meters 9.79 cubic meters Libya
1980s 180.9 cubic meters 222.61 cubic meters 41.71 cubic meters Singapore
1990s 144.7 cubic meters 172.67 cubic meters 27.97 cubic meters Singapore
2000s 120.86 cubic meters 137.95 cubic meters 17.09 cubic meters Singapore
2010s 107.08 cubic meters 110.16 cubic meters 3.08 cubic meters Singapore
2020s 98.12 cubic meters 107.33 cubic meters 9.21 cubic meters Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Libya or Singapore?
Singapore, at 106.44 cubic meters against 96.9 cubic meters in Libya as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Libya and Singapore?
9.54 cubic meters, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Singapore?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Libya and Singapore rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Libya ranks 170th and Singapore ranks 169th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/libya/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/libya/singapore/">Libya vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.