Lesotho vs Mauritius: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Lesotho
2,288 cubic meters
in 2022
Mauritius
2,179 cubic meters
in 2022
Lesotho rank
98th
Mauritius rank
101st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Lesotho
  • Mauritius
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k7.0k196119912022

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 2,288 cubic meters against 2,179 cubic meters in Mauritius, a difference of 109 cubic meters.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.

Lesotho ranks 98th and Mauritius ranks 101st of 183 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 6,110 cubic meters 3,678 cubic meters 2,432 cubic meters Lesotho
1970s 4,425 cubic meters 3,110 cubic meters 1,315 cubic meters Lesotho
1980s 3,294 cubic meters 2,717 cubic meters 577.07 cubic meters Lesotho
1990s 2,717 cubic meters 2,467 cubic meters 250.59 cubic meters Lesotho
2000s 2,648 cubic meters 2,253 cubic meters 395.14 cubic meters Lesotho
2010s 2,497 cubic meters 2,183 cubic meters 314.13 cubic meters Lesotho
2020s 2,313 cubic meters 2,175 cubic meters 138.42 cubic meters Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Lesotho or Mauritius?
Lesotho, at 2,288 cubic meters against 2,179 cubic meters in Mauritius as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Lesotho and Mauritius?
109 cubic meters, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Mauritius?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Lesotho and Mauritius rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Lesotho ranks 98th and Mauritius ranks 101st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Mauritius: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/lesotho/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/lesotho/mauritius/">Lesotho vs Mauritius: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.