Lebanon vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Lebanon
835.58 cubic meters
in 2022
Uganda
824.3 cubic meters
in 2022
Lebanon rank
134th
Uganda rank
135th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Lebanon
  • Uganda
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119912022

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 835.58 cubic meters against 824.3 cubic meters in Uganda, a difference of 11.28 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Lebanon ranks 134th and Uganda ranks 135th of 183 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 2,311 cubic meters 4,416 cubic meters 2,105 cubic meters Uganda
1970s 1,822 cubic meters 3,374 cubic meters 1,552 cubic meters Uganda
1980s 1,498 cubic meters 2,626 cubic meters 1,128 cubic meters Uganda
1990s 1,226 cubic meters 1,931 cubic meters 704.6 cubic meters Uganda
2000s 1,034 cubic meters 1,423 cubic meters 388.24 cubic meters Uganda
2010s 831.32 cubic meters 1,054 cubic meters 223.13 cubic meters Uganda
2020s 838.92 cubic meters 850.34 cubic meters 11.42 cubic meters Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Lebanon or Uganda?
Lebanon, at 835.58 cubic meters against 824.3 cubic meters in Uganda as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Lebanon and Uganda?
11.28 cubic meters, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Uganda?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Lebanon and Uganda rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Lebanon ranks 134th and Uganda ranks 135th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lebanon vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/lebanon/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/lebanon/uganda/">Lebanon vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.