Lebanon vs Nauru: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Lebanon
835.58 cubic meters
in 2022
Nauru
847.39 cubic meters
in 2022
Lebanon rank
134th
Nauru rank
133rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Lebanon
  • Nauru
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119912022

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 847.39 cubic meters against 835.58 cubic meters in Lebanon, a difference of 11.81 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Lebanon ahead.

Lebanon ranks 134th and Nauru ranks 133rd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 5 and Nauru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Nauru Difference Ahead
1960s 2,275 cubic meters 1,729 cubic meters 545.79 cubic meters Lebanon
1970s 1,822 cubic meters 1,429 cubic meters 392.93 cubic meters Lebanon
1980s 1,498 cubic meters 1,182 cubic meters 316 cubic meters Lebanon
1990s 1,226 cubic meters 993.75 cubic meters 232.3 cubic meters Lebanon
2000s 1,034 cubic meters 993.79 cubic meters 40.57 cubic meters Lebanon
2010s 831.32 cubic meters 926.9 cubic meters 95.57 cubic meters Nauru
2020s 838.92 cubic meters 853.44 cubic meters 14.52 cubic meters Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Lebanon or Nauru?
Nauru, at 847.39 cubic meters against 835.58 cubic meters in Lebanon as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Lebanon and Nauru?
11.81 cubic meters, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Nauru?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Lebanon and Nauru rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Lebanon ranks 134th and Nauru ranks 133rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lebanon vs Nauru: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/lebanon/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/lebanon/naoero/">Lebanon vs Nauru: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.