Japan vs Portugal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Japan
3,437 cubic meters
in 2022
Portugal
3,642 cubic meters
in 2022
Japan rank
77th
Portugal rank
74th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Japan
  • Portugal
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119912022

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 3,642 cubic meters against 3,437 cubic meters in Japan, a difference of 205 cubic meters.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 77th and Portugal ranks 74th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 4,392 cubic meters 4,255 cubic meters 137.54 cubic meters Japan
1970s 3,899 cubic meters 4,209 cubic meters 309.46 cubic meters Portugal
1980s 3,577 cubic meters 3,816 cubic meters 238.47 cubic meters Portugal
1990s 3,434 cubic meters 3,784 cubic meters 349.85 cubic meters Portugal
2000s 3,368 cubic meters 3,629 cubic meters 261.11 cubic meters Portugal
2010s 3,378 cubic meters 3,652 cubic meters 274.02 cubic meters Portugal
2020s 3,421 cubic meters 3,666 cubic meters 245.32 cubic meters Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Japan or Portugal?
Portugal, at 3,642 cubic meters against 3,437 cubic meters in Japan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Japan and Portugal?
205 cubic meters, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Portugal?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Japan and Portugal rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Japan ranks 77th and Portugal ranks 74th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Portugal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/japan/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/japan/portugal/">Japan vs Portugal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.