How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Sudan?

10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Israel vs Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Israel

80.03 cubic meters

in 2021

Sudan

81 cubic meters

in 2022

Israel rank

174th

Sudan rank

173rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

Israel
Sudan

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 81 cubic meters against 80.03 cubic meters in Israel, a difference of 0.97 cubic meters.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 174th and Sudan ranks 173rd of 183 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Israel	Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	88.72 cubic meters	98.25 cubic meters	9.53 cubic meters	Sudan
2020s	80.71 cubic meters	84.35 cubic meters	3.64 cubic meters	Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Israel or Sudan?: Sudan, at 81 cubic meters against 80.03 cubic meters in Israel as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Israel and Sudan?: 0.97 cubic meters, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Sudan?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Israel and Sudan rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?: Israel ranks 174th and Sudan ranks 173rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/israel/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/israel/sudan/">Israel vs Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit: cubic meters
Source: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.